That may be because in many ways Tom Byrne must have seemed to younger people at the paper as remnant to a day long gone [it is almost 39 years since he left the third floor of City Hall], when the city was used to having leaders who were Irish and Catholic and when the city and its news were important enough for the newspaper to cover.
Tom Byrne was not the last Irish mayor. We have one now. He was not the last Catholic mayor. That designation has to belong to Randy Kelly or Jim Scheibel. [I am sure that somebody knows.] But it seems that somehow there has not been a mayor so Catholic [he had been a seminarian before his military service and he was an archbishop’s brother] or so Irish, so connected with the city’s working and ethnic past. [For the record, I am neither Irish – at least not the green kind – nor am I Catholic.]
I realize that sometimes when we look back, we see things colored a bit, like early, color photographs left in the sun too long distort the colors we see, but it seems to me that the passing of Mayor Byrne in some ways illuminates that an era has changed.
The new
2 comments:
I don't think you are right that the maoyr and Archbishop Leo were brothers. I think that one or more ofthe papers or TVs said that many years ago maybe when the archbishop died, but i think they had to retract that.
But you are probably right that he was the last of an era.
You may be right, anonymous. I had always thought that Archbishop Byrne and Tom Byrne were brothers, but I was never close to the family and I could be in error. I note that I have not seen Tom Byrne's deceased siblings' names in either the Star-Journal or DPP obit stories or in the paid obit the family put in the paper. There are not many people who read this forum, but if there is somebody who can set us straight, please step up and set one of us straight
Ray Sammons
Post a Comment